Following the Petoskey City Council's recent approval of a zoning-ordinance change
allowing chickens in residential areas, a local resident has taken an initial step
toward putting the policy on the ballot for voters to accept or reject.
City clerk-treasurer Al Terry said Friday that Petoskey resident Timothy Strauss had
filed a notice of intent to petition for a referendum on the matter. With the filing
of this notice, Terry noted that the policy allowing for chickens will be delayed
from taking effect at least until March 25.
On Feb. 21, the city council voted 3-2 in favor of changing Petoskey's zoning
ordinance to allow for chickens to be kept — with restrictions — in single-family
residential areas, provided that a city permit is obtained. The policy would allow up
to four hens to be kept at a residence, but roosters would be prohibited.
A covered enclosure would need to be provided for chickens, with the birds required
to be kept in the covered enclosure or a fenced backyard area at all times. Chicken
feed and other items that potentially could be attractive to rats, mice or other
rodents would need to be protected against contact by those animals. Residents would
need to keep the chicken habitat in a clean and sanitary condition, free of offensive
odors, excess noise or other conditions that would be viewed as a nuisance.
A Michigan enabling law for local zoning specifies steps to be followed when a
referendum is sought on a zoning ordinance change. The minimum number of petition
signatures needed to qualify for the ballot is equivalent to 15 percent of the total
ballots cast in a given jurisdiction in the last Michigan gubernatorial election.
With 2,206 ballots cast in Petoskey for last November's gubernatorial vote, Terry
said 331 signatures of registered city voters would be needed to arrange the
referendum on the chicken policy.
To place the matter on the ballot, Terry said these signatures would need to be
submitted to city officials by March 25 — 30 days after the city published its legal
notice of the new ordinance.
If the city doesn't receive the necessary signatures by that date, Terry said the
ordinance would take effect immediately. If enough valid signatures are submitted for
a referendum, Terry said the new chicken policy would be delayed from taking effect
until voters decide its future in the next available regular election — in this
case, November's.
An ad placed in Friday's News-Review urged readers to "protect your property rights
and property values" and help in the repeal effort, and provided contact information
for those interested in signing a referendum petition.
Strauss declined to be interviewed about the referendum effort.
Farming for Our Future, a local education organization focused on farming and
gardening, has sought the ability to make chicken coops available for rental through
local schools, and the proposed zoning updates pertaining to chickens would allow for
this.
When she learned that initial steps had been taken toward a referendum on the new
chicken policy, Farming for Our Future executive director Toril Fisher said, "my
first reaction, to be honest with you, is, I was amazed and saddened."
At the same time, Fisher said she respects the democratic process involved in the
referendum effort.
Prior to the city council's vote on the new chicken policy, supporters of that change
circulated petitions locally, with more than 90 people expressing their support in
writing and online for allowing the backyard coops.
"It was really evident to me that people who have had exposure to hens or chickens
all have supported the ordinance change," Fisher said.
"It's obvious and evident to us that we need to continue to educate our community on
the benefits of having urban pens," she said, noting that the opportunity to produce
one's own food can be a part of sustainable living.
Fisher said the educational efforts wouldn't be intended to divide the community over
the chicken issue. As one educational step, supporters are looking into the
possibility of screening a documentary film, "Mad City Chickens," locally.
"Maybe people on both sides of the fence, pun intended, will come and learn more and
discuss it," Fisher said.
Noting the permitting requirement, the limit on the number of chickens at a home and
other restrictions, Fisher doesn't expect that some of the worries voiced about
chicken coops would materialize if they're allowed.
"If you're looking at a coop that has four hens in it, you're hardly going to know
its there," she said.
没有评论:
发表评论